
Academic Journal · Management System
Similarity, review, decision, and production. Each journal runs on its own site.
AI
Get help with writing, translation and reviewer matching; you decide what gets used.
In the corner of every page, even before you sign in. It walks you through how to do something and points to the right page.
Abstract and title fixes, Turkish-English counterparts, cover letter, keyword and JEL suggestions, whether ethics approval is needed, pre-filling from your file.
Reviewer matching suggestions (the invitation stays with the editor), generating and translating review forms, fixing and translating site text and emails.
Polish your own review notes, when the journal turns it on.
Platform
Steps from submission to publication are built around blindness, identity, and a clear order.
Double-blind or single-blind is a journal setting. Author and reviewer identity is hidden by role.
Each journal runs with its own identity, theme, and address. There is no data access across journals.
Similarity, pre-evaluation, routing, review, decision, revision, and production stay on the same record.
Submission keywords are matched with reviewers’ expertise and history. Editors see a justified list; they send the invitation.
Academics who accept review invitations are listed. Filter by field and journal; workload is visible. Invite from the list or by email.
A returned submission can be taken back into process; later stages can move one step back. Reviewers can download a certificate of thanks.
Try typesetting
Upload a Word (.docx) file. Headings, tables, and figures go into the journal’s template; you complete any missing details and get the PDF.
Try typesettingUpload Word
Drag and drop a .docx file, or choose one.
Template conversion
Text, tables, and figures are placed in the journal template. Complete missing details in the form.
Get the PDF
Preview, then download the PDF.
Process
Each submission stays on the same record. Authors see the steps; the journal can return a submission or move one step back.
The author sends the full text, title page, and declarations.
The editor sees the abstract, takes the file, then opens the package and records similarity in the same step.
A suitable submission goes to the editor-in-chief; a section editor or peer review follows.
Reviewers are assigned; blindness is a journal setting. Decision: accept, revise, or reject.
The secretariat finishes language and layout; the content is published.
Roles
Authors, the journal manager, editors, reviewers, and the secretariat each see only their own work.
Submits the content, reopens a returned draft, uploads revisions, and follows the steps.
Manages settings, staff, the site, and the workflow.
Routes the file and decides after review. Return or step-back requires a note.
Checks scope, format, and similarity, then forwards the file when it is ready.
Assigns reviewers by field and recommends a decision.
Evaluates the text; identity stays hidden from the author. A certificate of thanks can be downloaded.
Handles language, layout, and issue placement after acceptance.
Explore
Browse journals, then review application details, plans, and the platform.
For your journal
Open an application. Similarity, pre-evaluation, review, decision, and production stay on the same record.